ATI Radeon X1650 vs Pro WX 5100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 5100 with Radeon X1650, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 5100
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
14.38
+7889%

Pro WX 5100 outperforms ATI X1650 by a whopping 7889% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3641397
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.11no data
Power efficiency13.35no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameEllesmereRV516
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date18 November 2016 (8 years ago)20 November 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792no data
Core clock speed713 MHz635 MHz
Boost clock speed1086 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,700 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate121.62.540
Floating-point processing power3.892 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs1124

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz392 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s6.272 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 5100 14.38
+7889%
ATI X1650 0.18

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 5100 5548
+7714%
ATI X1650 71

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.38 0.18
Recency 18 November 2016 20 November 2007
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 80 nm

Pro WX 5100 has a 7888.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X1650 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 5100 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon X1650 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
Radeon Pro WX 5100
ATI Radeon X1650
Radeon X1650

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 95 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 5100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 65 votes

Rate Radeon X1650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.