Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon Pro WX 4100 Radeon Pro WX 4200 Radeon Pro WX 5100 Radeon Pro WX 7100 Radeon Pro WX 8100 Radeon Pro WX 8200 Radeon Pro WX 9200
VS
Iris Xe Graphics G4 Iris Xe Graphics G4 48EU Mobile Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 5100 with Iris Xe Graphics G7, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 5100
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
14.40
+31.7%

Pro WX 5100 outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 by a substantial 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Pro WX 5100 Pro WX 5100
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking362425
Place by popularitynot in top-10035
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.96no data
Power efficiency13.38no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameEllesmereTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date18 November 2016 (8 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores179296
Core clock speed713 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1086 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate121.6no data
Floating-point processing power3.892 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs112no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR4
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1250 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)DirectX 12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 47 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 14.40 10.93
Recency 18 November 2016 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm

Pro WX 5100 has a 31.7% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Xe Graphics G7, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 5100 is a workstation card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
Radeon Pro WX 5100
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7
Iris Xe Graphics G7
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Pro WX 5100 Radeon Pro WX 5100
vs
PRO W6300 Radeon PRO W6300
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
vs
RX 560X Mobile Radeon RX 560X Mobile
Pro WX 5100 Radeon Pro WX 5100
vs
FirePro D700 FirePro D700
GeForce 615 GeForce 615
vs
GT 630 OEM GeForce GT 630 OEM
GeForce 615 GeForce 615
vs
UHD Graphics 750 UHD Graphics 750
GeForce 615 GeForce 615
vs
UHD Graphics 750 (Alder Lake) UHD Graphics 750 (Alder Lake)
RX 580 XTR Radeon RX 580 XTR
vs
Weston Weston
RX 580 XTR Radeon RX 580 XTR
vs
RX 7900 GRE Radeon RX 7900 GRE
FirePro S9170 FirePro S9170
vs
ATI V9800P FirePro V9800P
FirePro S9170 FirePro S9170
vs
RTX 4060 GeForce RTX 4060
FirePro W7100 FirePro W7100
vs
UHD Graphics G4 UHD Graphics G4
FirePro W5100 FirePro W5100
vs
RX 7700 XT Radeon RX 7700 XT
FirePro W9100 FirePro W9100
vs
HD 7770 Radeon HD 7770

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 94 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 5100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2470 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.