GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Radeon Pro WX 4150

Place in the ranking	560	296
Place by popularity	not in top-100	20
Power efficiency	9.39	28.46
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Baffin	GA107
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	1 March 2017 (7 years ago)	17 December 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	896	2048
Core clock speed	1002 MHz	1185 MHz
Boost clock speed	1053 MHz	1477 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	45 Watt
Texture fill rate	58.97	94.53
Floating-point processing power	1.887 TFLOPS	6.05 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32
TMUs	56	64
Tensor Cores	no data	256
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	112.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+
G-SYNC support	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	+	-
VR Ready	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	-	8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	14−16 −200%	42 +200%
1440p	12−14 −183%	34 +183%
4K	9−10 −178%	25 +178%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

10−12

−345%

49
+345%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −147%	40−45 +147%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 −367%	42 +367%
Battlefield 5	18−20 −221%	60−65 +221%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −171%	35−40 +171%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −282%	42 +282%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −193%	40−45 +193%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −163%	50−55 +163%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −160%	110−120 +160%
Hitman 3	12−14 −238%	44 +238%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −128%	90−95 +128%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −237%	60−65 +237%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −163%	50−55 +163%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −165%	60−65 +165%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −66%	85−90 +66%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −147%	40−45 +147%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 −133%	21 +133%
Battlefield 5	18−20 −221%	60−65 +221%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −171%	35−40 +171%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −173%	30 +173%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −193%	40−45 +193%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −163%	50−55 +163%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −160%	110−120 +160%
Hitman 3	12−14 −231%	43 +231%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −128%	90−95 +128%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −237%	60−65 +237%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −163%	50−55 +163%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −170%	62 +170%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −100%	40−45 +100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −66%	85−90 +66%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −147%	40−45 +147%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 +28.6%	7 −28.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −171%	35−40 +171%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −127%	25 +127%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −193%	40−45 +193%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −160%	110−120 +160%
Hitman 3	12−14 −200%	39 +200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −128%	90−95 +128%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −139%	55 +139%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −57.1%	33 +57.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +194%	18 −194%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

−163%

50−55
+163%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −177%	35−40 +177%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 −180%	27−30 +180%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −217%	18−20 +217%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −700%	16−18 +700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −267%	10−12 +267%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −175%	21−24 +175%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −348%	100−110 +348%
Hitman 3	10−11 −120%	21−24 +120%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −153%	35−40 +153%
Metro Exodus	7−8 −386%	30−35 +386%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −1075%	47 +1075%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −158%	110−120 +158%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14

−158%

30−35
+158%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −200%	18−20 +200%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
Hitman 3	3−4 −367%	14−16 +367%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 −380%	95−100 +380%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −400%	20−22 +400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −533%	18−20 +533%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −175%	10−12 +175%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −200%	9−10 +200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −257%	24−27 +257%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1−2 −1900%	20−22 +1900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8

−129%

16−18
+129%

This is how Pro WX 4150 and RTX 2050 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 2050 Mobile is 200% faster in 1080p
RTX 2050 Mobile is 183% faster in 1440p
RTX 2050 Mobile is 178% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro WX 4150 is 194% faster.
in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 2050 Mobile is 1900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Pro WX 4150 is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
RTX 2050 Mobile is ahead in 70 tests (97%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	6.85	18.68
Recency	1 March 2017	17 December 2021
Chip lithography	14 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	45 Watt

RTX 2050 Mobile has a 172.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 11.1% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 4150 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 4150 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.