GeForce GT 710 vs Radeon Pro WX 4150

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 4150 with GeForce GT 710, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 4150
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
6.92
+325%

Pro WX 4150 outperforms GT 710 by a whopping 325% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking562959
Place by popularitynot in top-10072
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.04
Power efficiency9.535.91
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameBaffinGK208
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 March 2017 (7 years ago)27 March 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$34.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896192
Core clock speed1002 MHz954 MHz
Boost clock speed1053 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,000 million915 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt19 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data95 °C
Texture fill rate58.9715.26
Floating-point processing power1.887 TFLOPS0.3663 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs5616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x8
Lengthno data145 mm
Heightno data2.713" (6.9 cm)
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1.8 GB/s
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsDual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA
Multi monitor supportno data3 displays
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
3D Vision-+
PureVideo-+
PhysX-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 4150 6.92
+325%
GT 710 1.63

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 4150 2658
+325%
GT 710 626

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
+275%
8
−275%
1440p16−18
+300%
4
−300%
4K24−27
+300%
6
−300%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data4.37
1440pno data8.75
4Kno data5.83

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+1000%
2−3
−1000%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+250%
8
−250%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+220%
5
−220%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+260%
5
−260%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
Valorant 24−27
+380%
5−6
−380%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+1000%
2−3
−1000%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Dota 2 24−27
+100%
12
−100%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+107%
15
−107%
Fortnite 40−45
+413%
8−9
−413%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+460%
5
−460%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+167%
9
−167%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+350%
4
−350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+229%
16−18
−229%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+163%
8−9
−163%
Valorant 24−27
+380%
5−6
−380%
World of Tanks 100−110
+224%
30−35
−224%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+1000%
2−3
−1000%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Dota 2 24−27
+33.3%
18
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+158%
12−14
−158%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+460%
5
−460%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+229%
16−18
−229%
Valorant 24−27
+380%
5−6
−380%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+290%
10−11
−290%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
World of Tanks 50−55
+400%
10−11
−400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+160%
5
−160%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Valorant 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Dota 2 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 18−20
+157%
7
−157%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Fortnite 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+60%
5
−60%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5 0−1
Valorant 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

This is how Pro WX 4150 and GT 710 compete in popular games:

  • Pro WX 4150 is 275% faster in 1080p
  • Pro WX 4150 is 300% faster in 1440p
  • Pro WX 4150 is 300% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Pro WX 4150 is 1000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro WX 4150 is ahead in 51 test (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.92 1.63
Recency 1 March 2017 27 March 2014
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 19 Watt

Pro WX 4150 has a 324.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

GT 710, on the other hand, has 163.2% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 710 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 4150 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GT 710 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150
Radeon Pro WX 4150
NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GeForce GT 710

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 21 vote

Rate Radeon Pro WX 4150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 4382 votes

Rate GeForce GT 710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.