Quadro FX 350 vs Radeon Pro WX 4130

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking599not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.77no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameBaffinG72
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date1 March 2017 (7 years ago)20 April 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed1002 MHz550 MHz
Boost clock speed1053 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,000 million112 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt21 Watt
Texture fill rate42.122.200
Floating-point processing power1.348 TFLOPSno data
ROPs162
TMUs404

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz405 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s6.48 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 4130 2168
+2451%
FX 350 85

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2017 20 April 2006
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 21 Watt

Pro WX 4130 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

FX 350, on the other hand, has 138.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro WX 4130 and Quadro FX 350. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 4130 is a mobile workstation card while Quadro FX 350 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130
Radeon Pro WX 4130
NVIDIA Quadro FX 350
Quadro FX 350

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 34 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 4130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Quadro FX 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.