RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs Radeon Pro WX 3200

Place in the ranking	581	48
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	12.51	no data
Power efficiency	6.65	53.06
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Polaris 23	AD104
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	2 July 2019 (5 years ago)	21 March 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$199	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	6144
Core clock speed	1082 MHz	720 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1560 MHz
Number of transistors	2,200 million	35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	70 Watt
Texture fill rate	34.62	299.5
Floating-point processing power	1.385 TFLOPS	19.17 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	80
TMUs	32	192
Tensor Cores	no data	192
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	168 mm
Width	MXM Module	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	20 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	160 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	280.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

4x mini-DisplayPort

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 3200 6.28

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 53.95
+759%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 3200 2414

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 20741
+759%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	18 −733%	150−160 +733%
4K	9 −733%	75−80 +733%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	11.06	no data
4K	22.11	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −757%	120−130 +757%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −733%	100−105 +733%
Elden Ring	16−18 −713%	130−140 +713%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 −750%	170−180 +750%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −757%	120−130 +757%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −733%	100−105 +733%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −746%	220−230 +746%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −713%	130−140 +713%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −733%	150−160 +733%
Valorant	18−20 −742%	160−170 +742%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 −750%	170−180 +750%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −757%	120−130 +757%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −733%	100−105 +733%
Dota 2	16 −713%	130−140 +713%
Elden Ring	16−18 −713%	130−140 +713%
Far Cry 5	15 −700%	120−130 +700%
Fortnite	35−40 −711%	300−310 +711%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −746%	220−230 +746%
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 −757%	180−190 +757%
Metro Exodus	4 −650%	30−33 +650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50−55 −669%	400−450 +669%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −733%	150−160 +733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 −750%	170−180 +750%
Valorant	18−20 −742%	160−170 +742%
World of Tanks	95−100 −759%	850−900 +759%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 −750%	170−180 +750%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −757%	120−130 +757%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −733%	100−105 +733%
Dota 2	35 −757%	300−310 +757%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −728%	240−250 +728%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −746%	220−230 +746%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50−55 −669%	400−450 +669%
Valorant	18−20 −742%	160−170 +742%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	6−7 −733%	50−55 +733%
Elden Ring	8−9 −713%	65−70 +713%
Grand Theft Auto V	6−7 −733%	50−55 +733%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −711%	300−310 +711%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −700%	40−45 +700%
World of Tanks	45−50 −678%	350−400 +678%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 −718%	90−95 +718%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −733%	75−80 +733%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −700%	40−45 +700%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −746%	110−120 +746%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −718%	90−95 +718%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −713%	65−70 +713%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −757%	60−65 +757%
Valorant	16−18 −713%	130−140 +713%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −724%	140−150 +724%
Elden Ring	3−4 −700%	24−27 +700%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −724%	140−150 +724%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −700%	16−18 +700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	18−20 −733%	150−160 +733%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −650%	30−33 +650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −724%	140−150 +724%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −700%	40−45 +700%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −700%	16−18 +700%
Dota 2	9 −733%	75−80 +733%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −757%	60−65 +757%
Fortnite	6−7 −733%	50−55 +733%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −733%	50−55 +733%
Valorant	6−7 −733%	50−55 +733%

This is how Pro WX 3200 and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation compete in popular games:

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 733% faster in 1080p
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 733% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	6.28	53.95
Recency	2 July 2019	21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	20 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	70 Watt

Pro WX 3200 has 7.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 759.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 400% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 3200 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.