RTX A2000 vs Radeon Pro W6800X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated137
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data86.03
Power efficiencyno data36.67
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 21GA106
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date3 August 2021 (3 years ago)10 August 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,799 $449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38403328
Core clock speed1800 MHz562 MHz
Boost clock speed2087 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors26,800 million12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate500.9124.8
Floating-point processing power16.03 TFLOPS7.987 TFLOPS
ROPs9648
TMUs240104
Tensor Coresno data104
Ray Tracing Cores6026

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceApple MPXPCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm167 mm
WidthQuad-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsApple MPXNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s288.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 4x Thunderbolt4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 70 Watt

Pro W6800X has a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

RTX A2000, on the other hand, has 185.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W6800X and RTX A2000. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W6800X
Radeon Pro W6800X
NVIDIA RTX A2000
RTX A2000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 20 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6800X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 558 votes

Rate RTX A2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.