Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs Radeon Pro W6800X

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated429
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameNavi 21Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date3 August 2021 (3 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,799 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38404
Core clock speed1800 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2087 MHz1950 MHz
Number of transistors26,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Wattno data
Texture fill rate500.9no data
Floating-point processing power16.03 TFLOPSno data
ROPs96no data
TMUs240no data
Ray Tracing Cores60no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceApple MPXno data
Length267 mmno data
WidthQuad-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsApple MPXno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount32 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 4x Thunderboltno data
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 August 2021 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W6800X and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc). We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W6800X is a workstation card while Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W6800X
Radeon Pro W6800X
Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 20 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6800X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 7 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.