GeForce RTX 4090 Ti vs Radeon Pro W6800X Duo

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking101not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-10066
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.47no data
Power efficiency6.92no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 21AD102
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date3 August 2021 (3 years ago)2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384018176
Core clock speed1800 MHz2325 MHz
Boost clock speed1967 MHz2565 MHz
Number of transistors26,800 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate472.11,457
Floating-point processing power15.11 TFLOPS93.24 TFLOPS
ROPs96192
TMUs240568
Tensor Coresno data568
Ray Tracing Cores60142

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceApple MPXPCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm336 mm
WidthQuad-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount32 GB24 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s1.15 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 4x Thunderbolt1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 600 Watt

Pro W6800X Duo has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 50% lower power consumption.

RTX 4090 Ti, on the other hand, has a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W6800X Duo and GeForce RTX 4090 Ti. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W6800X Duo is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4090 Ti is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti
GeForce RTX 4090 Ti

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 40 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6800X Duo on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 3328 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.