Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile vs Radeon Pro W6800

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking52not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation23.31no data
Power efficiency14.31no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Xe-LPG (2023)
GPU code nameNavi 21Meteor Lake GT1
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date8 June 2021 (3 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,249 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38401024
Core clock speed2075 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed2320 MHz2250 MHz
Number of transistors26,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate556.8144.0
Floating-point processing power17.82 TFLOPS4.608 TFLOPS
ROPs9632
TMUs24064
Ray Tracing Cores60no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16Ring Bus
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount32 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.21.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 June 2021 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 28 Watt

Pro W6800 has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 792.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W6800 and Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W6800 is a workstation card while Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W6800
Radeon Pro W6800
Intel Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile
Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 81 vote

Rate Radeon Pro W6800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 18 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.