Quadro P5000 vs Radeon Pro W6600X

Radeon Pro W6400 Radeon Pro W6600 Radeon Pro W6600X Radeon Pro W6800 Radeon Pro W6800X Radeon Pro W6800X Duo Radeon Pro W6900X
VS
P104-100 Quadro P4000 Quadro P5000 Tesla P4

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro W6600X and Quadro P5000, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Pro W6600X
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
34.11
+4%

Pro W6600X outperforms P5000 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Pro W6600X Pro W6600X
Quadro P5000 Quadro P5000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking157167
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation52.956.64
Power efficiency19.5712.54
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameNavi 23GP104
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date3 August 2021 (3 years ago)1 October 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 $2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro W6600X has 697% better value for money than Quadro P5000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482048
Core clock speed2068 MHz1607 MHz
Boost clock speed2479 MHz1733 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate317.3277.3
Floating-point processing power10.15 TFLOPS8.873 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs128160
Ray Tracing Cores32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1127 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s192 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort
Display Portno data1.4

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
3D Stereono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12
Shader Model6.76.4
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.31.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro W6600X 34.11
+4%
Quadro P5000 32.79

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro W6600X 13113
+4%
Quadro P5000 12608

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100−110
+2%
98
−2%
4K40−45
+0%
40
+0%

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.99
+265%
25.50
−265%
4K17.48
+258%
62.48
−258%
  • Pro W6600X has 265% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • Pro W6600X has 258% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Elden Ring 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Dota 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Elden Ring 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Dota 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Elden Ring 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
World of Tanks 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Elden Ring 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

This is how Pro W6600X and Quadro P5000 compete in popular games:

  • Pro W6600X is 2% faster in 1080p
  • A tie in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 34.11 32.79
Recency 3 August 2021 1 October 2016
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 100 Watt

Pro W6600X has a 4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro P5000, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 20% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro W6600X and Quadro P5000.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon Pro W6600X
Radeon Pro W6600X
NVIDIA Quadro P5000
Quadro P5000
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Pro W6600X Radeon Pro W6600X
vs
Pro VII Radeon Pro VII
Quadro P5000 Quadro P5000
vs
Pro 5700 XT Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Pro W6600X Radeon Pro W6600X
vs
RTX A2000 RTX A2000
P4200 Max-Q Quadro P4200 Max-Q
vs
K3000M Quadro K3000M
Radeon 760M Radeon 760M
vs
Iris Plus Graphics G7 64EU Mobile Iris Plus Graphics G7 64EU Mobile
Radeon 780M Radeon 780M
vs
520 Mobile DDR3 Radeon 520 Mobile DDR3
RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
vs
RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
vs
RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 5000 X2 Mobile Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile
vs
RTX 3050 A Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile
RX 6300 Radeon RX 6300
vs
RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB
RX 7600 Radeon RX 7600
vs
GTX 280 GeForce GTX 280
PRO W7500 Radeon PRO W7500
vs
Quadro P520 Quadro P520
RTX 4070 SUPER GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
vs
Sony Playstation Vita GPU

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Pro W6600X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 182 votes

Rate Quadro P5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.