GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon Pro W6600X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro W6600X with GeForce GTX 1660 Ti, including specs and performance data.

Pro W6600X
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
33.96
+1.5%

Pro W6600X outperforms GTX 1660 Ti by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking143147
Place by popularitynot in top-10035
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data25.84
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2022)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameNavi 23Turing TU116
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date3 August 2021 (2 years ago)22 February 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 $279
Current priceno data$284 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481536
Core clock speedno data1500 MHz
Boost clock speed2479 MHz1770 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate317.3169.9

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed16 GB/s12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.31.2.131
CUDAno data7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro W6600X 33.96
+1.5%
GTX 1660 Ti 33.47

Radeon Pro W6600X outperforms GeForce GTX 1660 Ti by 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro W6600X 13113
+1.4%
GTX 1660 Ti 12926

Radeon Pro W6600X outperforms GeForce GTX 1660 Ti by 1% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100−110
−4%
104
+4%
1440p55−60
−3.6%
57
+3.6%
4K35−40
−8.6%
38
+8.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 78
+4%
75−80
−4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 86
+7.5%
80−85
−7.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 74
+5.7%
70−75
−5.7%
Battlefield 5 130
+8.3%
120−130
−8.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95
+5.6%
90−95
−5.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 71
+9.2%
65−70
−9.2%
Far Cry 5 104
+4%
100−105
−4%
Far Cry New Dawn 112
+1.8%
110−120
−1.8%
Forza Horizon 4 131
+9.2%
120−130
−9.2%
Hitman 3 65−70
+6.2%
65−70
−6.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180
+5.9%
170−180
−5.9%
Metro Exodus 134
+3.1%
130−140
−3.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 119
+8.2%
110−120
−8.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 156
+4%
150−160
−4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+2.4%
85−90
−2.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 72
+2.9%
70−75
−2.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55
+10%
50−55
−10%
Battlefield 5 121
+10%
110−120
−10%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85
+6.3%
80−85
−6.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 57
+3.6%
55−60
−3.6%
Far Cry 5 82
+2.5%
80−85
−2.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 79
+5.3%
75−80
−5.3%
Forza Horizon 4 218
+3.8%
210−220
−3.8%
Hitman 3 65−70
+6.2%
65−70
−6.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
+3.1%
130−140
−3.1%
Metro Exodus 103
+3%
100−105
−3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 103
+3%
100−105
−3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 127
+5.8%
120−130
−5.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 116
+5.5%
110−120
−5.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+2.4%
85−90
−2.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 53
+6%
50−55
−6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50
+11.1%
45−50
−11.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70
+7.7%
65−70
−7.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
+2.2%
45−50
−2.2%
Far Cry 5 61
+1.7%
60−65
−1.7%
Forza Horizon 4 97
+2.1%
95−100
−2.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 102
+2%
100−105
−2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110
+10%
100−105
−10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
+3.3%
60−65
−3.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+2.4%
85−90
−2.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 97
+2.1%
95−100
−2.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75
+7.1%
70−75
−7.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 82
+2.5%
80−85
−2.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 41
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 36
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55
+10%
50−55
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 27
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 67
+3.1%
65−70
−3.1%
Forza Horizon 4 77
+2.7%
75−80
−2.7%
Hitman 3 40−45
+5%
40−45
−5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75
+7.1%
70−75
−7.1%
Metro Exodus 65
+8.3%
60−65
−8.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 78
+4%
75−80
−4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+2.2%
45−50
−2.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65
+8.3%
60−65
−8.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 36
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 29
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Hitman 3 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 26
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 25
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 19
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 25
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+10%
10−11
−10%
Far Cry 5 20
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 51
+2%
50−55
−2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 42
+5%
40−45
−5%
Metro Exodus 35
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 44
+10%
40−45
−10%

This is how Pro W6600X and GTX 1660 Ti compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Ti is 4% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti is 4% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 Ti is 9% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.96 33.47
Recency 3 August 2021 22 February 2019
Cost $699 $279
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro W6600X and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W6600X is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W6600X
Radeon Pro W6600X
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Pro W6600X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 6935 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.