Arc 7-Cores iGPU vs UHD Graphics 750

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 750 with Arc 7-Cores iGPU, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics 750
2021
15 Watt
4.51

Arc 7-Cores iGPU outperforms UHD Graphics 750 by a whopping 283% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking662320
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency20.70no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1 (2020−2021)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameRocket Lake GT1Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date30 March 2021 (3 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2567
Core clock speed300 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1300 MHz2200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate20.80no data
Floating-point processing power0.6656 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing Busno data
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_2
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.2-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8−9
−325%
34
+325%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−650%
90
+650%
Elden Ring 10−12
−391%
50−55
+391%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−331%
55−60
+331%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−383%
58
+383%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−274%
70−75
+274%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−193%
40−45
+193%
Valorant 9−10
−667%
65−70
+667%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−331%
55−60
+331%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−158%
31
+158%
Dota 2 14−16
−407%
71
+407%
Elden Ring 10−12
−391%
50−55
+391%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−47.8%
34
+47.8%
Fortnite 24−27
−262%
90−95
+262%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−274%
70−75
+274%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−64.3%
23
+64.3%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−370%
45−50
+370%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−208%
120−130
+208%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−193%
40−45
+193%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−247%
52
+247%
Valorant 9−10
−667%
65−70
+667%
World of Tanks 75−80
−183%
210−220
+183%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−331%
55−60
+331%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−275%
45−50
+275%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−52.2%
35
+52.2%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−274%
70−75
+274%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−208%
120−130
+208%
Valorant 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Elden Ring 5−6
−460%
27−30
+460%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
−267%
110−120
+267%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−400%
14−16
+400%
World of Tanks 30−35
−275%
120−130
+275%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−340%
40−45
+340%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−760%
40−45
+760%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−283%
21−24
+283%
Valorant 12−14
−246%
45−50
+246%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−275%
60−65
+275%
Elden Ring 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−81.3%
27−30
+81.3%
Metro Exodus 0−1 12−14
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−246%
45−50
+246%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−81.3%
27−30
+81.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−325%
16−18
+325%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−340%
21−24
+340%
Fortnite 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−733%
24−27
+733%
Valorant 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Elden Ring 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 38
+0%
38
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 66
+0%
66
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+0%
22
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics 750 and Arc 7-Cores iGPU compete in popular games:

  • Arc 7-Cores iGPU is 325% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc 7-Cores iGPU is 800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc 7-Cores iGPU is ahead in 39 tests (71%)
  • there's a draw in 16 tests (29%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.51 17.26
Recency 30 March 2021 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm

Arc 7-Cores iGPU has a 282.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc 7-Cores iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 750 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 750 is a desktop card while Arc 7-Cores iGPU is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 750
Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU
Arc 7-Cores iGPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 401 vote

Rate UHD Graphics 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 51 vote

Rate Arc 7-Cores iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.