Arc A580 vs Radeon Pro W6600M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro W6600M with Arc A580, including specs and performance data.

Pro W6600M
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 90 Watt
25.79

Arc A580 outperforms Pro W6600M by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking207196
Place by popularitynot in top-10058
Power efficiency22.7412.09
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNavi 23DG2-512
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date8 June 2021 (3 years ago)10 October 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17923072
Core clock speed1224 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speed2034 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate227.8384.0
Floating-point processing power7.29 TFLOPS12.29 TFLOPS
ROPs6496
TMUs112192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Cores2824

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro W6600M 25.79
Arc A580 26.66
+3.4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro W6600M 11524
Arc A580 11912
+3.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD95−100
−8.4%
103
+8.4%
1440p50−55
−12%
56
+12%
4K30−35
−10%
33
+10%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 160−170
−106%
331
+106%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−17.7%
73
+17.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 60−65
−78.7%
109
+78.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
−2.8%
100−110
+2.8%
Counter-Strike 2 160−170
−63.4%
263
+63.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−4.8%
65
+4.8%
Far Cry 5 90−95
−45.7%
134
+45.7%
Fortnite 130−140
−2.3%
130−140
+2.3%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+2.8%
107
−2.8%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
−38.2%
123
+38.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 60−65
−27.9%
78
+27.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−3.6%
110−120
+3.6%
Valorant 180−190
−2.2%
180−190
+2.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
−2.8%
100−110
+2.8%
Counter-Strike 2 160−170
+24.8%
129
−24.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
−0.7%
270−280
+0.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+8.8%
57
−8.8%
Dota 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
−32.6%
122
+32.6%
Fortnite 130−140
−2.3%
130−140
+2.3%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+7.8%
102
−7.8%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
−28.1%
114
+28.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 100−105
+16.3%
86
−16.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 60−65
−4.9%
64
+4.9%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−54%
97
+54%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−3.6%
110−120
+3.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
−97.7%
174
+97.7%
Valorant 180−190
−2.2%
180−190
+2.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
−2.8%
100−110
+2.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+17%
53
−17%
Dota 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
−23.9%
114
+23.9%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+26.4%
87
−26.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 60−65
+15.1%
53
−15.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−3.6%
110−120
+3.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+29.4%
68
−29.4%
Valorant 180−190
−2.2%
180−190
+2.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 130−140
−2.3%
130−140
+2.3%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 65−70
−23.1%
80
+23.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 190−200
−3.1%
200−210
+3.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+43.2%
37
−43.2%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−50%
57
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 220−230
−1.8%
220−230
+1.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−2.6%
75−80
+2.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−34.5%
39
+34.5%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−33.8%
87
+33.8%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−1.4%
75
+1.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
−21.9%
39
+21.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−12.2%
55
+12.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 65−70
−4.3%
70−75
+4.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+57.9%
19
−57.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+42.1%
38
−42.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
−5.6%
18−20
+5.6%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−54.2%
37
+54.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−41.9%
61
+41.9%
Valorant 160−170
−3.6%
170−180
+3.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−4.7%
45−50
+4.7%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
−3.3%
30−35
+3.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−61.5%
21
+61.5%
Dota 2 85−90
−2.3%
90−95
+2.3%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−42.4%
47
+42.4%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−12%
56
+12%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
−22.2%
22
+22.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−3.1%
30−35
+3.1%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
−6.3%
30−35
+6.3%

This is how Pro W6600M and Arc A580 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A580 is 8% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A580 is 12% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A580 is 10% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Pro W6600M is 58% faster.
  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the Arc A580 is 106% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro W6600M is ahead in 12 tests (19%)
  • Arc A580 is ahead in 50 tests (79%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.79 26.66
Recency 8 June 2021 10 October 2023
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 175 Watt

Pro W6600M has 94.4% lower power consumption.

Arc A580, on the other hand, has a 3.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro W6600M and Arc A580.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W6600M is a mobile workstation card while Arc A580 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
Radeon Pro W6600M
Intel Arc A580
Arc A580

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 373 votes

Rate Arc A580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro W6600M or Arc A580, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.