GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs Radeon Pro W6400

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro W6400 with GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Pro W6400
2022
4 GB GDDR6, 50 Watt
21.04

RTX 4060 Mobile outperforms Pro W6400 by a whopping 118% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking26673
Place by popularitynot in top-10056
Power efficiency28.9727.43
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 24AD107
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date19 January 2022 (3 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7683072
Core clock speed2331 MHz1545 MHz
Boost clock speed2331 MHz1890 MHz
Number of transistors5,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate111.9181.4
Floating-point processing power3.58 TFLOPS11.61 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs4896
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Cores1224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro W6400 21.04
RTX 4060 Mobile 45.83
+118%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro W6400 8089
RTX 4060 Mobile 17621
+118%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50−55
−122%
111
+122%
1440p27−30
−130%
62
+130%
4K16−18
−144%
39
+144%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 96
+0%
96
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 126
+0%
126
+0%
Elden Ring 134
+0%
134
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 95
+0%
95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50
+0%
50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 267
+0%
267
+0%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 80
+0%
80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 42
+0%
42
+0%
Dota 2 149
+0%
149
+0%
Elden Ring 138
+0%
138
+0%
Far Cry 5 101
+0%
101
+0%
Fortnite 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 215
+0%
215
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 142
+0%
142
+0%
Metro Exodus 37
+0%
37
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 72
+0%
72
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 39
+0%
39
+0%
Dota 2 156
+0%
156
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 187
+0%
187
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 85
+0%
85
+0%
Elden Ring 106
+0%
106
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 85
+0%
85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
World of Tanks 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45
+0%
45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24
+0%
24
+0%
Far Cry 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 127
+0%
127
+0%
Metro Exodus 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 76
+0%
76
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 25
+0%
25
+0%
Dota 2 76
+0%
76
+0%
Elden Ring 52
+0%
52
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 76
+0%
76
+0%
Metro Exodus 37
+0%
37
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 76
+0%
76
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+0%
10
+0%
Dota 2 126
+0%
126
+0%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 62
+0%
62
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

This is how Pro W6400 and RTX 4060 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4060 Mobile is 122% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4060 Mobile is 130% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4060 Mobile is 144% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.04 45.83
Recency 19 January 2022 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 115 Watt

Pro W6400 has 130% lower power consumption.

RTX 4060 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 117.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro W6400 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W6400 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W6400
Radeon Pro W6400
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 28 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3445 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.