GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Radeon Pro W5700X

Radeon Pro W5500 Radeon Pro W5500X Radeon Pro W5700 Radeon Pro W5700X Radeon Pro W6400 Radeon Pro W6600 Radeon Pro W6600X Radeon Pro W6800 Radeon Pro W6800X Radeon Pro W6800X Duo Radeon Pro W6900X
VS
RTX 2050 Max-Q RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 2060 Mobile RTX 2060 Max-Q RTX 2070 Mobile RTX 2070 Max-Q RTX 2070 Super Max-Q RTX 2080 Mobile RTX 2080 Max-Q RTX 3050 Mobile RTX 4050 Mobile RTX 4060 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro W5700X with GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Pro W5700X
2019
16 GB GDDR6, 205 Watt
45.58
+145%

Pro W5700X outperforms RTX 2050 Mobile by a whopping 145% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Pro W5700X Pro W5700X
RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 2050 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking74293
Place by popularitynot in top-10017
Cost-effectiveness evaluation43.46no data
Power efficiency15.4028.69
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 10GA107
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date11 December 2019 (4 years ago)17 December 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23042048
Core clock speed1243 MHz1185 MHz
Boost clock speed2040 MHz1477 MHz
Number of transistors10,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate293.894.53
Floating-point processing power9.4 TFLOPS6.05 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs14464
Tensor Coresno data256
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length305 mmno data
WidthQuad-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 4x Thunderbolt1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD110−120
+144%
45
−144%
1440p85−90
+136%
36
−136%
4K70−75
+133%
30
−133%

Cost per frame, $

1080p9.08no data
1440p11.75no data
4K14.27no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 49
+0%
49
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 42
+0%
42
+0%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 42
+0%
42
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Hitman 3 44
+0%
44
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21
+0%
21
+0%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+0%
30
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Hitman 3 43
+0%
43
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 62
+0%
62
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7
+0%
7
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+0%
25
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Hitman 3 39
+0%
39
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55
+0%
55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
+0%
33
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18
+0%
18
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Hitman 3 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 47
+0%
47
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Hitman 3 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how Pro W5700X and RTX 2050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Pro W5700X is 144% faster in 1080p
  • Pro W5700X is 136% faster in 1440p
  • Pro W5700X is 133% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 45.58 18.64
Recency 11 December 2019 17 December 2021
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 45 Watt

Pro W5700X has a 144.5% higher aggregate performance score, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

RTX 2050 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 355.6% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro W5700X is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W5700X is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
Radeon Pro W5700X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Pro W5700X Radeon Pro W5700X
vs
RTX 2000 Ada Generation RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2050 Mobile GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
vs
Arc 8-Core iGPU Arc 8 Core iGPU
Pro W5700X Radeon Pro W5700X
vs
L40S L40S
Radeon 540 Radeon 540
vs
Vega 8 Embedded Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
GeForce 845M GeForce 845M
vs
ATI Mobility HD 4860 Mobility Radeon HD 4860
GeForce 705A GeForce 705A
vs
GRID A100B GRID A100B
RX 460 1024SP Radeon RX 460 1024SP
vs
Haswell GT1 Haswell GT1
HD 7350 OEM PCI Radeon HD 7350 OEM PCI
vs
RX 6950 XT Radeon RX 6950 XT
GTX 660M GeForce GTX 660M
vs
Graphics Radeon Graphics
RX 6700 Radeon RX 6700
vs
RX 7900 GRE Radeon RX 7900 GRE
UHD Graphics 730 UHD Graphics 730
vs
RTX 3050 OEM GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MX450 30.5W 10Gbps GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps
vs
Arc A530M Arc A530M
MX150 GP107 GeForce MX150 GP107
vs
GTX 1630 GeForce GTX 1630

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 14 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 2026 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.