Tesla M2090 vs Radeon Pro W5700

Place in the ranking	120	464
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	44.37	no data
Power efficiency	12.85	2.61
Architecture	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code name	Navi 10	GF110
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	19 November 2019 (5 years ago)	25 July 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$799	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	512
Core clock speed	1243 MHz	651 MHz
Boost clock speed	1930 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	10,300 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	205 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	277.9	41.66
Floating-point processing power	8.893 TFLOPS	1.332 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	48
TMUs	144	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	305 mm	248 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	924 MHz
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	177.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.5	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	-	2.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	38.43	9.51
Recency	19 November 2019	25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	205 Watt	250 Watt

Pro W5700 has a 304.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 22% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro W5700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Tesla M2090 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.