GeForce 9300 + nForce 730i vs Radeon Pro W5500

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking235not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation42.95no data
Power efficiency13.07no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameNavi 14C79
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date10 February 2020 (4 years ago)17 April 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores140816
Core clock speed1187 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed1400 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,400 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate123.23.600
Floating-point processing power3.942 TFLOPS0.0352 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs888

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCI
Length267 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.54.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 February 2020 17 April 2007
Chip lithography 7 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 40 Watt

Pro W5500 has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

9300 + nForce 730i, on the other hand, has 212.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W5500 and GeForce 9300 + nForce 730i. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W5500 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 9300 + nForce 730i is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W5500
Radeon Pro W5500
NVIDIA GeForce 9300 + nForce 730i
GeForce 9300 + nForce 730i

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 77 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 7 votes

Rate GeForce 9300 nForce 730i on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.