Radeon Pro 5600M vs Pro Vega 64

Place in performance ranking	146	213
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.14	no data
Architecture	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)	Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)
GPU code name	Vega 10	Navi 10
Market segment	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	27 June 2017 (7 years ago)	15 June 2020 (4 years ago)
Current price	$6074	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4096	2560
Core clock speed	1250 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1350 MHz	1265 MHz
Number of transistors	12,500 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	345.6	164.8
Floating-point performance	11,059 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro Vega 64 and Radeon Pro 5600M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	IGP	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	HBM2
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	2048 Bit	2048 Bit
Memory clock speed	1572 MHz	1540 MBps
Memory bandwidth	402.4 GB/s	394.2 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.125	1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro Vega 64 33.53
+39%

Pro 5600M 24.12

Pro Vega 64 outperforms Pro 5600M by 39% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro Vega 64 12949
+39%

Pro 5600M 9313

Pro Vega 64 outperforms Pro 5600M by 39% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

50−55
+28.2%

35−40

−28.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 +30.4%	45−50 −30.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 +31%	40−45 −31%
Battlefield 5	100−105 +26.6%	75−80 −26.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 +32.7%	45−50 −32.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +28.2%	35−40 −28.2%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +33.9%	55−60 −33.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	85−90 +34.9%	60−65 −34.9%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +33.3%	100−110 −33.3%
Hitman 3	65−70 +35.4%	45−50 −35.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	130−140 +36.8%	95−100 −36.8%
Metro Exodus	100−105 +26.6%	75−80 −26.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	85−90 +32.8%	60−65 −32.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110−120 +34.1%	80−85 −34.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	95−100 +37.7%	65−70 −37.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 +30.4%	45−50 −30.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 +31%	40−45 −31%
Battlefield 5	100−105 +26.6%	75−80 −26.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 +32.7%	45−50 −32.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +28.2%	35−40 −28.2%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +33.9%	55−60 −33.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	85−90 +34.9%	60−65 −34.9%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +33.3%	100−110 −33.3%
Hitman 3	65−70 +35.4%	45−50 −35.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	130−140 +36.8%	95−100 −36.8%
Metro Exodus	100−105 +26.6%	75−80 −26.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	85−90 +32.8%	60−65 −32.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110−120 +34.1%	80−85 −34.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75−80 +38.9%	50−55 −38.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	95−100 +37.7%	65−70 −37.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 +30.4%	45−50 −30.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 +31%	40−45 −31%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 +32.7%	45−50 −32.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +28.2%	35−40 −28.2%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +33.9%	55−60 −33.9%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +33.3%	100−110 −33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	130−140 +36.8%	95−100 −36.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110−120 +34.1%	80−85 −34.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75−80 +38.9%	50−55 −38.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	95−100 +37.7%	65−70 −37.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

85−90
+32.8%

60−65

−32.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +30.4%	45−50 −30.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	70−75 +37.3%	50−55 −37.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 +20%	24−27 −20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 +25%	24−27 −25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 +25%	30−35 −25%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +20%	14−16 −20%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +34.1%	40−45 −34.1%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +35.4%	45−50 −35.4%
Hitman 3	40−45 +37.9%	27−30 −37.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 +30%	50−55 −30%
Metro Exodus	60−65 +30.4%	45−50 −30.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	70−75 +34.6%	50−55 −34.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +37.9%	27−30 −37.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +33.3%	18−20 −33.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

55−60
+37.5%

40−45

−37.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−33 +25%	24−27 −25%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +26.3%	18−20 −26.3%
Hitman 3	24−27 +26.3%	18−20 −26.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +25%	27−30 −25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +23.5%	16−18 −23.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 +34.6%	24−27 −34.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +20%	14−16 −20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +38.5%	12−14 −38.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +28.6%	14−16 −28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +38.5%	12−14 −38.5%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +36.4%	30−35 −36.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +25%	27−30 −25%
Metro Exodus	30−33 +30.4%	21−24 −30.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 +20%	10−11 −20%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

27−30
+28.6%

21−24

−28.6%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	33.53	24.12
Recency	27 June 2017	15 June 2020
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	50 Watt