GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs Radeon Pro Vega 64

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro Vega 64 with GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition, including specs and performance data.

Pro Vega 64
2017
16 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
33.50
+1451%

Pro Vega 64 outperforms GT 755M Mac Edition by a whopping 1451% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking156864
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameVega 10GK107
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date27 June 2017 (7 years ago)8 November 2013 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096384
Core clock speed1250 MHz1085 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate345.634.72
Floating-point processing power11.06 gflops0.8333 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
WidthIGPMXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB1 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1572 MHz5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth402.4 GB/s80 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.1.1251.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.50 2.16
Recency 27 June 2017 8 November 2013
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 50 Watt

Pro Vega 64 has a 1450.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

GT 755M Mac Edition, on the other hand, has 400% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 64 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
Radeon Pro Vega 64
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 19 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 10 votes

Rate GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.