GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB vs Radeon Pro Vega 56
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 170 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 50.81 | no data |
| Architecture | Vega (2017−2020) | Ampere (2020−2024) |
| GPU code name | Vega | GA107 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 14 December 2017 (6 years ago) | 6 July 2022 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3584 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 1247 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 990 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 12,500 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 210 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 280.0 | 63.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 8.96 gflops | 4.055 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Length | 267 mm | no data |
| Width | IGP | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 96 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 786 MHz | 12 GB/s |
| Memory bandwidth | 402.4 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Portable Device Dependent |
| HDMI | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.125 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | - | 8.6 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 14 December 2017 | 6 July 2022 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 210 Watt | 35 Watt |
Pro Vega 56 has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.
RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 500% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Vega 56 and GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 56 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
