Arc 140T Mobile vs Radeon Pro Vega 20

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking399not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.99no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Xe2-LPG (2025)
GPU code nameVega 12Arrow Lake
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date14 November 2018 (6 years ago)13 January 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12801024
Core clock speed815 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1283 MHz2350 MHz
Manufacturing process technology14 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate102.6150.4
Floating-point processing power3.284 TFLOPS4.813 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs8064
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width1024 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed740 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth189.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 November 2018 13 January 2025
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 35 Watt

Arc 140T Mobile has an age advantage of 6 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 185.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Vega 20 and Arc 140T Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 20 is a mobile workstation card while Arc 140T Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
Radeon Pro Vega 20
Intel Arc 140T Mobile
Arc 140T

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 87 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 20 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc 140T Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro Vega 20 or Arc 140T Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.