Arc A780 vs Radeon Pro VII

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking161not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.86no data
Power efficiency9.14no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameVega 20DG2-512
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date13 May 2020 (4 years ago)2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,899 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38404096
Core clock speed1400 MHz2200 MHz
Boost clock speed1700 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors13,230 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate408.0563.2
Floating-point processing power13.06 TFLOPS18.02 TFLOPS
ROPs64128
TMUs240256
Tensor Coresno data512
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length305 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1093 MHz
Memory bandwidth1024 GB/s559.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 200 Watt

Arc A780 has a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro VII and Arc A780. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro VII is a workstation graphics card while Arc A780 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro VII
Radeon Pro VII
Intel Arc A780
Arc A780

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1549 votes

Rate Radeon Pro VII on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 75 votes

Rate Arc A780 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.