ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 SE vs Radeon Pro VII

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking158not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.83no data
Power efficiency9.25no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameVega 20RV280
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date13 May 2020 (4 years ago)26 January 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,899 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3840no data
Core clock speed1400 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed1700 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,230 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Texture fill rate408.01.000
Floating-point processing power13.06 TFLOPSno data
ROPs644
TMUs2404

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16AGP 8x
Length305 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2DDR
Maximum RAM amount16 GB128 MB
Memory bus width4096 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz164 MHz
Memory bandwidth1024 GB/s2.624 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a1x VGA, 2x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)8.1
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 May 2020 26 January 2004
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 150 nm

Pro VII has an age advantage of 16 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2042.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro VII and All-In-Wonder 9200 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro VII is a workstation graphics card while All-In-Wonder 9200 SE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro VII
Radeon Pro VII
ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 SE
All-In-Wonder 9200 SE

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1548 votes

Rate Radeon Pro VII on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder 9200 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.