GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q vs Radeon Pro V520

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking172not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.77no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 12AD103
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 December 2020 (3 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23049728
Core clock speed1000 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speed1600 MHz1455 MHz
Number of transistorsno data45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate230.4442.3
Floating-point processing power7.373 TFLOPS28.31 TFLOPS
ROPs64112
TMUs144304
Tensor Coresno data304
Ray Tracing Coresno data76

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s448.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2020 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 80 Watt

RTX 4090 Max-Q has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 181.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro V520 and GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro V520 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro V520
Radeon Pro V520
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 15 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 145 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.