Arc 7 A770M vs Radeon Pro V520

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking170not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.82no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNavi 12DG2-512
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 December 2020 (3 years ago)2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23044096
Core clock speed1000 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1600 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistorsno data21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate230.4422.4
Floating-point processing power7.373 TFLOPS13.52 TFLOPS
ROPs64128
TMUs144256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
WidthIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz12 GB/s
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s384.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.21.3

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 120 Watt

Arc 7 A770M has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 87.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro V520 and Arc 7 A770M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro V520 is a workstation graphics card while Arc 7 A770M is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro V520
Radeon Pro V520
Intel Arc 7 A770M
Arc 7 A770M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 15 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 48 votes

Rate Arc 7 A770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.