GeForce GTX 490 vs Radeon Pro V320

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameVega 10GF100
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584480
Core clock speed852 MHz608 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt365 Watt
Texture fill rate336.036.48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm279 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1536 MB
Memory bus width2048 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1890 MBps3.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s164.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.75.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1536 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 365 Watt

Pro V320 has a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 58.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro V320 and GeForce GTX 490. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro V320 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 490 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro V320
Radeon Pro V320
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 490
GeForce GTX 490

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 6 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 25 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 490 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.