Quadro K4200 vs Radeon Pro Duo

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro Duo and Quadro K4200, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Pro Duo
2016
8 GB High Bandwidth Memory (HBM), 350 Watt
21.24
+89%

Pro Duo outperforms K4200 by an impressive 89% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking259421
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.502.20
Power efficiency4.167.13
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameCapsaicinGK104
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date26 April 2016 (8 years ago)22 July 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 $854.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro Duo has 105% better value for money than Quadro K4200.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40961344
Compute units128no data
Core clock speedno data771 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz784 MHz
Number of transistors8,900 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt108 Watt
Texture fill rate256.087.81
Floating-point processing power8.192 TFLOPS2.107 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs256112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length277 mm241 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors3x 8-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHigh Bandwidth Memory (HBM)GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1350 MHz
Memory bandwidth512 GB/s172.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
Enduro+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
PowerTune+-
TressFX+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (11_0)
Shader Model6.05.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan++
Mantle+-
CUDA-3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro Duo 21.24
+89%
Quadro K4200 11.24

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro Duo 8183
+88.9%
Quadro K4200 4331

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.24 11.24
Recency 26 April 2016 22 July 2014
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 108 Watt

Pro Duo has a 89% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Quadro K4200, on the other hand, has 224.1% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro Duo is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K4200 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Duo
Radeon Pro Duo
NVIDIA Quadro K4200
Quadro K4200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 3622 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Duo on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 161 vote

Rate Quadro K4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.