Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 vs Radeon Pro Duo

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking254not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.34no data
Power efficiency4.20no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)PowerVR SGX5 (2008−2011)
GPU code nameCapsaicinGMA 600
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date26 April 2016 (8 years ago)1 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40964
Compute units128no data
Core clock speedno data400 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors8,900 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Wattno data
Texture fill rate256.0no data
Floating-point processing power8.192 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs256no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length277 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors3x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHigh Bandwidth Memory (HBM)no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width4096 Bitno data
Memory clock speed500 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth512 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortno data
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
Enduro+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
PowerTune+-
TressFX+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 129.0c
Shader Model6.0no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan+-
Mantle+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 April 2016 1 May 2010
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm

Pro Duo has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Duo and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Duo is a workstation card while Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Duo
Radeon Pro Duo
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 3621 vote

Rate Radeon Pro Duo on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.