GeForce4 440 Go vs Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1518
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameEllesmereNV17 A5
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date24 April 2017 (7 years ago)6 February 2002 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23042
Core clock speed1243 MHz220 MHz
Boost clock speedno data220 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Texture fill rate179.00.88
Floating-point processing power5.728 TFLOPSno data
ROPs322
TMUs1444

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Length305 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount16 GB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz220 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s7.04 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)8.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 April 2017 6 February 2002
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 150 nm

Pro Duo Polaris has an age advantage of 15 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and GeForce4 440 Go. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Duo Polaris is a workstation card while GeForce4 440 Go is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
NVIDIA GeForce4 440 Go
GeForce4 440 Go

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 35 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Duo Polaris on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate GeForce4 440 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.