ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 vs Radeon Pro 580

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking271not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.28no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Ultra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)
GPU code namePolaris 20RV516
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date5 June 2017 (7 years ago)2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304no data
Core clock speed1100 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,700 million105 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt32 Watt
Texture fill rate172.82.400
Floating-point processing power5.53 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs1444

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x1
Lengthno data170 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1695 MHz800 MBps
Memory bandwidth217.0 GB/s12.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x S-Video, 1x DMS-59

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 32 Watt

Pro 580 has a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1, on the other hand, has 368.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 580 and FireMV 2250 PCIe x1. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 580 is a mobile workstation card while FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 580
Radeon Pro 580
ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1
FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 70 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.