Tesla P6 vs Radeon Pro 5700

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking180not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.21no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameNavi 10GP104
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date4 August 2020 (4 years ago)24 March 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23042048
Core clock speed1243 MHz1012 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz1506 MHz
Number of transistors10,300 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate194.4192.8
Floating-point processing power6.221 TFLOPS6.169 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs144128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
WidthIGPMXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s192.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.21.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 August 2020 24 March 2017
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 90 Watt

Pro 5700 has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Tesla P6, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 44.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 5700 and Tesla P6. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5700
Radeon Pro 5700
NVIDIA Tesla P6
Tesla P6

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 6 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Tesla P6 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.