NX-SoC vs Radeon Pro 5700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking179not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.46no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameNavi 10GM20B
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date4 August 2020 (4 years ago)17 March 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304256
Core clock speed1243 MHz384 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz768 MHz
Number of transistors10,300 million2,000 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm20 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate194.412.29
Floating-point processing power6.221 TFLOPS0.3932 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs14416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16IGP
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR4
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.21.1.126
CUDA-5.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 August 2020 17 March 2017
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 20 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 15 Watt

Pro 5700 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

NX-SoC, on the other hand, has 766.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 5700 and NX-SoC. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5700 is a workstation card while NX-SoC is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5700
Radeon Pro 5700
NVIDIA NX-SoC
NX-SoC

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 6 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate NX-SoC on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.