GMA X3000 vs Radeon Pro 5700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking179not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameNavi 10Broadwater
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date4 August 2020 (4 years ago)1 June 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304no data
Core clock speedno data500 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHzno data
Number of transistors10,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate194.44.000
Floating-point performance6.221 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
WidthIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed12 GB/sSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c
Shader Model6.53.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 August 2020 1 June 2006
Chip lithography 7 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 13 Watt

Pro 5700 has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

GMA X3000, on the other hand, has 900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 5700 and GMA X3000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5700 is a workstation graphics card while GMA X3000 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5700
Radeon Pro 5700
Intel GMA X3000
GMA X3000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 6 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 28 votes

Rate GMA X3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.