Arc A380 vs Radeon Pro 5700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 5700 with Arc A380, including specs and performance data.

Pro 5700
2020
8 GB GDDR6, 130 Watt
30.67
+3.2%

Pro 5700 outperforms Arc A380 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking167175
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation65.2314.21
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Xe HPG (2020−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 10DG2-128
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date4 August 2020 (3 years ago)14 June 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149
Current price$356 $591 (4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro 5700 has 359% better value for money than Arc A380.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041024
Core clock speedno data2000 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors10,300 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate194.4131.2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data222 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed12 GB/s15500 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s186.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 5700 30.67
+3.2%
Arc A380 29.73

Radeon Pro 5700 outperforms Arc A380 by 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro 5700 11844
+89.9%
Arc A380 6238

Radeon Pro 5700 outperforms Arc A380 by 90% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45−50
+0%
45
+0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
−1.7%
61
+1.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50−55
+0%
50
+0%
Battlefield 5 100−105
+3.1%
95−100
−3.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
−1.7%
60−65
+1.7%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−3.1%
65−70
+3.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80
−1.3%
75−80
+1.3%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−1.3%
76
+1.3%
Hitman 3 60−65
−1.7%
60−65
+1.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−105
−1%
101
+1%
Metro Exodus 95−100
+2.2%
90−95
−2.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
−2.7%
75−80
+2.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 95−100
+1.1%
94
−1.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+0%
55
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+0%
50
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−5.7%
37
+5.7%
Battlefield 5 100−105
+3.1%
95−100
−3.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
−1.7%
60−65
+1.7%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−3.1%
65−70
+3.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80
−1.3%
75−80
+1.3%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
−2.5%
120−130
+2.5%
Hitman 3 60−65
−1.7%
60−65
+1.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+1.7%
110−120
−1.7%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+0%
30
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
−2.7%
75−80
+2.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
+0%
80
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
−1.5%
66
+1.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−7.4%
29
+7.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
−3.3%
31
+3.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
−1.7%
60−65
+1.7%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−3.1%
65−70
+3.1%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−3.6%
57
+3.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−4%
52
+4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
−1.7%
61
+1.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+2.9%
34
−2.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
−4.2%
25
+4.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
−2.7%
75−80
+2.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−1.8%
55−60
+1.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
−1.5%
65−70
+1.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
−3.3%
30−35
+3.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
−3.3%
30−35
+3.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−5%
40−45
+5%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−4%
50−55
+4%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Hitman 3 35−40
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
−3.3%
60−65
+3.3%
Metro Exodus 55−60
−3.6%
55−60
+3.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70−75
+2.9%
65−70
−2.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+2.6%
35−40
−2.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−7.4%
27−30
+7.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hitman 3 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−4.8%
21−24
+4.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+2.9%
30−35
−2.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−5.6%
18−20
+5.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−6.3%
16−18
+6.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−6.3%
16−18
+6.3%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−2.5%
40−45
+2.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−7.4%
27−30
+7.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−8.3%
24−27
+8.3%

This is how Pro 5700 and Arc A380 compete in popular games:

  • A tie in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.67 29.73
Recency 4 August 2020 14 June 2022
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 75 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro 5700 and Arc A380.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5700 is a workstation graphics card while Arc A380 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5700
Radeon Pro 5700
Intel Arc A380
Arc A380

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 6 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 742 votes

Rate Arc A380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.