ATI Radeon HD 5770 vs Pro 560X

Place in the ranking	464	666
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.89
Power efficiency	8.79	2.83
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code name	Polaris 21	Juniper
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	16 July 2018 (6 years ago)	13 October 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$159

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	800
Core clock speed	1004 MHz	850 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	1,040 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	108 Watt
Texture fill rate	64.26	34.00
Floating-point processing power	2.056 TFLOPS	1.36 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	64	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	208 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1270 MHz	4800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	81.28 GB/s	76.8 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 560X 9.56
+116%

ATI HD 5770 4.43

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 560X 3677
+116%

ATI HD 5770 1705

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Pro 560X 7590
+215%

ATI HD 5770 2410

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	50−55 +108%	24 −108%
Full HD	38 −28.9%	49 +28.9%
1440p	41 +128%	18−20 −128%
4K	16 +129%	7−8 −129%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	3.24
1440p	no data	8.83
4K	no data	22.71

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	18−20 +50%	12−14 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +111%	9−10 −111%
Elden Ring	27−30 +170%	10−11 −170%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 +138%	12−14 −138%
Counter-Strike 2	18−20 +50%	12−14 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +111%	9−10 −111%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +100%	18−20 −100%
Metro Exodus	36 +260%	10−11 −260%
Red Dead Redemption 2	36 +157%	14−16 −157%
Valorant	46 +411%	9−10 −411%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	44 +238%	12−14 −238%
Counter-Strike 2	18−20 +50%	12−14 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +111%	9−10 −111%
Dota 2	46 +229%	14−16 −229%
Elden Ring	27−30 +170%	10−11 −170%
Far Cry 5	42 +90.9%	21−24 −90.9%
Fortnite	55−60 +115%	24−27 −115%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +100%	18−20 −100%
Grand Theft Auto V	33 +136%	14−16 −136%
Metro Exodus	23 +130%	10−11 −130%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	34 −11.8%	35−40 +11.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10 −40%	14−16 +40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +93.3%	14−16 −93.3%
Valorant	21 +133%	9−10 −133%
World of Tanks	86 +16.2%	70−75 −16.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	31 +138%	12−14 −138%
Counter-Strike 2	18−20 +50%	12−14 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +111%	9−10 −111%
Dota 2	69 +393%	14−16 −393%
Far Cry 5	37 +68.2%	21−24 −68.2%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +100%	18−20 −100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 +94.7%	35−40 −94.7%
Valorant	26 +189%	9−10 −189%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Elden Ring	12−14 +160%	5−6 −160%
Grand Theft Auto V	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 +53.3%	30−33 −53.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
World of Tanks	57 +78.1%	30−35 −78.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 +200%	6−7 −200%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Far Cry 5	24 +140%	10−11 −140%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +320%	5−6 −320%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +800%	2−3 −800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 +83.3%	6−7 −83.3%
Valorant	19 +46.2%	12−14 −46.2%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Dota 2	13 −23.1%	16−18 +23.1%
Elden Ring	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Grand Theft Auto V	13 −23.1%	16−18 +23.1%
Metro Exodus	7	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	26 +100%	12−14 −100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	13 −23.1%	16−18 +23.1%
World of Tanks	30 +150%	12−14 −150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	9 +125%	4−5 −125%
Counter-Strike 2	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Dota 2	20−22 +25%	16−18 −25%
Far Cry 5	12 +140%	5−6 −140%
Fortnite	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Valorant	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%

This is how Pro 560X and ATI HD 5770 compete in popular games:

Pro 560X is 108% faster in 900p
ATI HD 5770 is 29% faster in 1080p
Pro 560X is 128% faster in 1440p
Pro 560X is 129% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro 560X is 800% faster.
in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the ATI HD 5770 is 40% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Pro 560X is ahead in 55 tests (92%)
ATI HD 5770 is ahead in 5 tests (8%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.56	4.43
Recency	16 July 2018	13 October 2009
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	108 Watt

Pro 560X has a 115.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 44% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro 560X is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 5770 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 560X is a mobile workstation card while Radeon HD 5770 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.