AeroBox GPU vs Radeon Pro 5600M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking232not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency33.13no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameNavi 12Kryptos
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date15 June 2020 (4 years ago)13 March 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560896
Core clock speed1000 MHz935 MHz
Boost clock speed1030 MHz985 MHz
Manufacturing process technology7 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate164.855.16
Floating-point processing power5.274 TFLOPS1.765 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs16056

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16IGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2DDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed770 MHz1066 MHz
Memory bandwidth394.2 GB/s68.22 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.21.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 June 2020 13 March 2020
Chip lithography 7 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 100 Watt

Pro 5600M has an age advantage of 3 months, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 5600M and AeroBox GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5600M is a mobile workstation card while AeroBox GPU is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon Pro 5600M
AMD AeroBox GPU
AeroBox GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 77 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 679 votes

Rate AeroBox GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.