GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q vs Radeon Pro 5300M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 5300M with GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

Pro 5300M
2019
4 GB GDDR6, 85 Watt
15.42

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q outperforms Pro 5300M by a whopping 130% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking345141
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.4430.45
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 14TU104
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date13 November 2019 (5 years ago)2 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12802560
Core clock speed1000 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHz1155 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate100.0184.8
Floating-point processing power3.2 TFLOPS5.914 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs80160
Tensor Coresno data320
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s352.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.140
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 5300M 15.42
RTX 2070 Super Max-Q 35.53
+130%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 5300M 5940
RTX 2070 Super Max-Q 13689
+130%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45−50
−133%
105
+133%
1440p30−35
−133%
70
+133%
4K18−21
−161%
47
+161%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−158%
60−65
+158%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−183%
99
+183%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−224%
81
+224%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−130%
110−120
+130%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−226%
101
+226%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−158%
60−65
+158%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−253%
127
+253%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−226%
137
+226%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
−82%
180−190
+82%
Hitman 3 27−30
−255%
103
+255%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
−94.9%
150−160
+94.9%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−172%
144
+172%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−160%
109
+160%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−156%
120−130
+156%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
−55.7%
120−130
+55.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−117%
75−80
+117%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−180%
70
+180%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−130%
110−120
+130%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−194%
91
+194%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−158%
60−65
+158%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−200%
108
+200%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−131%
97
+131%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
−82%
180−190
+82%
Hitman 3 27−30
−252%
102
+252%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
−94.9%
150−160
+94.9%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−168%
142
+168%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−117%
91
+117%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−156%
120−130
+156%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−100%
70−75
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
−55.7%
120−130
+55.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−77.1%
62
+77.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−140%
60
+140%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−119%
68
+119%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−158%
60−65
+158%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−111%
76
+111%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
−82%
180−190
+82%
Hitman 3 27−30
−197%
86
+197%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
−33.3%
104
+33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−156%
120−130
+156%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−103%
75
+103%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+33.9%
59
−33.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−119%
92
+119%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
−127%
65−70
+127%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−167%
64
+167%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−213%
47
+213%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−194%
50
+194%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−200%
54
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−151%
200−210
+151%
Hitman 3 18−20
−150%
45−50
+150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−148%
75−80
+148%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−178%
75
+178%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−204%
85−90
+204%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−213%
50−55
+213%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
−90.5%
180−190
+90.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−184%
71
+184%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−133%
35−40
+133%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−218%
35
+218%
Hitman 3 10−12
−164%
27−30
+164%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
−119%
170−180
+119%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−307%
61
+307%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−240%
51
+240%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−256%
32
+256%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−214%
21−24
+214%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−263%
29
+263%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−250%
28
+250%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−133%
45−50
+133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−220%
45−50
+220%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−157%
36
+157%

This is how Pro 5300M and RTX 2070 Super Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is 133% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is 133% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is 161% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro 5300M is 34% faster.
  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is 307% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro 5300M is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is ahead in 71 test (99%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.42 35.53
Recency 13 November 2019 2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 80 Watt

Pro 5300M has a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 130.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 6.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 5300M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5300M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon Pro 5300M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 170 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 504 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.