RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB vs Radeon Pro 5300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking295not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency15.19no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 14GA107
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date4 August 2020 (4 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12802560
Core clock speed1000 MHz652 MHz
Boost clock speed1650 MHz1140 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate132.091.20
Floating-point processing power4.224 TFLOPS5.837 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs8080
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s132.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 August 2020 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 60 Watt

Pro 5300 has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 41.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 5300 and RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5300 is a workstation card while RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5300
Radeon Pro 5300
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB
RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 98 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 20 votes

Rate RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.