GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition vs Radeon Pro 5300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 5300 with GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition, including specs and performance data.

Pro 5300
2020
4 GB GDDR6, 85 Watt
18.54
+1683%

Pro 5300 outperforms GT 640M Mac Edition by a whopping 1683% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2981097
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.952.23
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameNavi 14GK107
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date4 August 2020 (4 years ago)3 February 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280384
Core clock speed1000 MHz745 MHz
Boost clock speed1650 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,400 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt32 Watt
Texture fill rate132.023.84
Floating-point processing power4.224 TFLOPS0.5722 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs8032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s40 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.21.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.54 1.04
Recency 4 August 2020 3 February 2013
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 32 Watt

Pro 5300 has a 1682.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

GT 640M Mac Edition, on the other hand, has 165.6% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro 5300 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5300 is a workstation card while GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5300
Radeon Pro 5300
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 98 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 9 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.