GeForce 7150M vs Radeon Pro 455

Place in the ranking	518	1479
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	15.91	no data
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	no data
GPU code name	Baffin	C67
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	30 October 2016 (8 years ago)	1 February 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	3
Core clock speed	855 MHz	1 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	425 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	41.04	no data
Floating-point processing power	1.313 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	16	no data
TMUs	48	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	shared Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	1270 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	81.28 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	shared Memory
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.0	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 455 8.09
+16080%

GeForce 7150M 0.05

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 455 3112
+17189%

GeForce 7150M 18

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	33	-0−1
4K	22	-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +100%	8−9 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +1500%	1−2 −1500%
Elden Ring	21−24	0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +100%	8−9 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +1500%	1−2 −1500%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +700%	4−5 −700%
Metro Exodus	21−24	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +633%	3−4 −633%
Valorant	27−30	0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +100%	8−9 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +1500%	1−2 −1500%
Dota 2	38	0−1
Elden Ring	21−24	0−1
Far Cry 5	35−40 +600%	5−6 −600%
Fortnite	45−50	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +700%	4−5 −700%
Grand Theft Auto V	24	0−1
Metro Exodus	21−24	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	60−65 +1500%	4−5 −1500%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +633%	3−4 −633%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +525%	4−5 −525%
Valorant	27−30	0−1
World of Tanks	145 +1511%	9−10 −1511%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +100%	8−9 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +1500%	1−2 −1500%
Dota 2	62	0−1
Far Cry 5	35−40 +600%	5−6 −600%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +700%	4−5 −700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	60−65 +1500%	4−5 −1500%
Valorant	27−30	0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	9−10	0−1
Elden Ring	10−12	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	10−11	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8	0−1
World of Tanks	55−60	0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +325%	4−5 −325%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18	0−1
Metro Exodus	12−14	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Valorant	20−22 +400%	4−5 −400%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	2−3	0−1
Dota 2	18−20 +26.7%	14−16 −26.7%
Elden Ring	5−6	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 +20%	14−16 −20%
Metro Exodus	4−5	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +20%	14−16 −20%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	2−3	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Dota 2	23 +53.3%	14−16 −53.3%
Far Cry 5	10−11	0−1
Fortnite	8−9	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	9−10	0−1
Valorant	8−9	0−1