Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs Radeon Pro 450

Place in performance ranking	548	524
Place by popularity	not in top-100	57
Architecture	Polaris (2016−2019)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	Polaris 11	Tiger Lake Xe
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	27 October 2016 (7 years ago)	15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	80
Core clock speed	800 MHz	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1350 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	28 Watt
Texture fill rate	32.00	no data
Floating-point performance	1.024 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	no data
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	5080 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	81.28 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	+	-
Quick Sync	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12_1
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.0	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 450 7.05

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 7.52
+6.7%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Pro 450 14245

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 21729
+52.5%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Pro 450 4502

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 5310
+17.9%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Pro 450 3252

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 3987
+22.6%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Pro 450 21533

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 21818
+1.3%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Pro 450 200518
+20.4%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 166479

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	29 +52.6%	19 −52.6%
1440p	8−9 −12.5%	9 +12.5%
4K	19 +46.2%	13 −46.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

10−12

−27.3%

14
+27.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −5.6%	18−20 +5.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 −111%	19 +111%
Battlefield 5	20−22 −10%	21−24 +10%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −18.2%	13 +18.2%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −6.3%	16−18 +6.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	20−22 −5%	21−24 +5%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −6.5%	45−50 +6.5%
Hitman 3	14−16 −14.3%	16 +14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −2.4%	40−45 +2.4%
Metro Exodus	20−22 −90%	38 +90%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −5.3%	20−22 +5.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −4.2%	24−27 +4.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −17%	62 +17%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −5.6%	18−20 +5.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 −77.8%	16 +77.8%
Battlefield 5	20−22 −10%	21−24 +10%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +10%	10 −10%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −6.3%	16−18 +6.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	20−22 −5%	21−24 +5%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −6.5%	45−50 +6.5%
Hitman 3	14−16 −7.1%	15 +7.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −2.4%	40−45 +2.4%
Metro Exodus	20−22 −35%	27 +35%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −5.3%	20−22 +5.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 +0%	24 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −4.8%	21−24 +4.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +8.2%	49 −8.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −5.6%	18−20 +5.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +37.5%	8 −37.5%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −6.3%	16−18 +6.3%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −6.5%	45−50 +6.5%
Hitman 3	14−16 +16.7%	12 −16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +163%	16 −163%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 +20%	20 −20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +90.9%	11 −90.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −3.8%	55−60 +3.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

−5.3%

20−22
+5.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −12.5%	9−10 +12.5%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −8%	27−30 +8%
Hitman 3	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%
Metro Exodus	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 −220%	16 +220%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −66.7%	10 +66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −4.4%	45−50 +4.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14

−8.3%

12−14
+8.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Hitman 3	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −13.6%	24−27 +13.6%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8

+0%

7−8

+0%

This is how Pro 450 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compete in popular games:

Pro 450 is 53% faster in 1080p
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 13% faster in 1440p
Pro 450 is 46% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro 450 is 163% faster.
in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 220% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Pro 450 is ahead in 7 tests (10%)
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is ahead in 43 tests (60%)
there's a draw in 22 tests (31%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	7.05	7.52
Recency	27 October 2016	15 August 2020
Chip lithography	14 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	28 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs has a 6.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 167.9% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro 450 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 450 is a mobile workstation card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.