GeForce G102M vs Radeon Pro 450

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 450 with GeForce G102M, including specs and performance data.

Pro 450
2016
2 GB GDDR5, 35 Watt
7.07
+1544%

Pro 450 outperforms G102M by a whopping 1544% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5511247
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.842.10
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameBaffinC79
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date30 October 2016 (8 years ago)8 January 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64016
Core clock speed800 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt14 Watt
Texture fill rate32.003.600
Floating-point processing power1.024 TFLOPS0.0352 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data48
ROPs164
TMUs408

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 1.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR2
Maximum RAM amount2 GBUp to 512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1270 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth81.28 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsVGAHDMIDisplayPortSingle Link DVILVDS
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
Power managementno data8.0

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 450 7.07
+1544%
GeForce G102M 0.43

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 450 2722
+1530%
GeForce G102M 167

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27
+2600%
1−2
−2600%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−12 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10 0−1
Battlefield 5 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12 0−1
Far Cry 5 16−18 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+2200%
2−3
−2200%
Hitman 3 14−16 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+2000%
2−3
−2000%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+1667%
3−4
−1667%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10 0−1
Battlefield 5 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12 0−1
Far Cry 5 16−18 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+2200%
2−3
−2200%
Hitman 3 14−16 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+2000%
2−3
−2000%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+1667%
3−4
−1667%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12 0−1
Far Cry 5 16−18 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+2200%
2−3
−2200%
Hitman 3 14−16 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+2000%
2−3
−2000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+1667%
3−4
−1667%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 8−9 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+2400%
1−2
−2400%
Hitman 3 10−12 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16 0−1
Metro Exodus 7−8 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+2150%
2−3
−2150%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14 0−1

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6 0−1
Hitman 3 3−4 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
Metro Exodus 4−5 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8 0−1

This is how Pro 450 and GeForce G102M compete in popular games:

  • Pro 450 is 2600% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.07 0.43
Recency 30 October 2016 8 January 2009
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 14 Watt

Pro 450 has a 1544.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce G102M, on the other hand, has 150% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro 450 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce G102M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 450 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce G102M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 450
Radeon Pro 450
NVIDIA GeForce G102M
GeForce G102M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 50 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 40 votes

Rate GeForce G102M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.