GeForce 9650M GT vs Radeon Pro 450

Place in the ranking	550	1283
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	14.07	1.09
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code name	Baffin	G96C
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	30 October 2016 (8 years ago)	19 August 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	32
Core clock speed	800 MHz	550 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	314 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	23 Watt
Texture fill rate	32.00	8.800
Floating-point processing power	1.024 TFLOPS	0.0848 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	8
TMUs	40	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Bus support	no data	PCI-E 2.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	MXM-II

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	256 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1270 MHz	800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	81.28 GB/s	25.6 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	1920x1200

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	6.4	4.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
OpenCL	2.0	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 450 7.06
+1861%

9650M GT 0.36

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 450 2722
+1887%

9650M GT 137

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Pro 450 14245
+991%

9650M GT 1306

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	25 +2400%	1−2 −2400%
4K	19	0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

10−12
+450%

2−3

−450%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +500%	3−4 −500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10	0−1
Battlefield 5	20−22 +1900%	1−2 −1900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +450%	2−3 −450%
Far Cry 5	16−18	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	20−22 +1900%	1−2 −1900%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +2200%	2−3 −2200%
Hitman 3	14−16 +250%	4−5 −250%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +425%	8−9 −425%
Metro Exodus	20−22 +1900%	1−2 −1900%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 +500%	4−5 −500%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +89.3%	27−30 −89.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +500%	3−4 −500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10	0−1
Battlefield 5	20−22 +1900%	1−2 −1900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +450%	2−3 −450%
Far Cry 5	16−18	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	20−22 +1900%	1−2 −1900%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +2200%	2−3 −2200%
Hitman 3	14−16 +250%	4−5 −250%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +425%	8−9 −425%
Metro Exodus	20−22 +1900%	1−2 −1900%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 +500%	4−5 −500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +133%	9−10 −133%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +89.3%	27−30 −89.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +500%	3−4 −500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +450%	2−3 −450%
Far Cry 5	16−18	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +2200%	2−3 −2200%
Hitman 3	14−16 +250%	4−5 −250%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +425%	8−9 −425%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 +500%	4−5 −500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +133%	9−10 −133%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +89.3%	27−30 −89.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12	0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4	0−1
Far Cry 5	8−9	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +2400%	1−2 −2400%
Hitman 3	10−12 +83.3%	6−7 −83.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Metro Exodus	7−8	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +2150%	2−3 −2150%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14
+500%

2−3

−500%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6	0−1
Hitman 3	3−4	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +2100%	1−2 −2100%
Metro Exodus	4−5	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	4−5	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	8−9	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8
+250%

2−3

−250%

This is how Pro 450 and 9650M GT compete in popular games:

Pro 450 is 2400% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Pro 450 is 650% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, Pro 450 surpassed 9650M GT in all 29 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	7.06	0.36
Recency	30 October 2016	19 August 2008
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	256 MB
Chip lithography	14 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	23 Watt

Pro 450 has a 1861.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

9650M GT, on the other hand, has 52.2% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro 450 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9650M GT in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 450 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce 9650M GT is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.