Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary vs Picasso

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated86
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data43.08
Power efficiencyno data14.02
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code namePicassoNavi 10
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release dateno data7 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6402560
Core clock speed300 MHz1680 MHz
Boost clock speed1301 MHz1980 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate52.04316.8
Floating-point processing power1.665 TFLOPS10.14 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs40160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 225 Watt

Picasso has 2150% lower power consumption.

RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Picasso and Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Picasso
Radeon Picasso
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary
Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon Picasso on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 125 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.