RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon PRO WX 3100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO WX 3100 with RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

PRO WX 3100
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 65 Watt
6.59

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms PRO WX 3100 by a whopping 805% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking56033
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.34no data
Power efficiency7.0527.65
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameLexano data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date12 June 2017 (7 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5127424
Core clock speed925 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1219 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt150 Watt (60 - 150 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate39.01no data
Floating-point processing power1.248 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPortno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO WX 3100 6.59
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 59.65
+805%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO WX 3100 2543
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 23017
+805%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
−746%
110−120
+746%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−764%
95−100
+764%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−782%
150−160
+782%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−775%
70−75
+775%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−795%
170−180
+795%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−757%
120−130
+757%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−764%
95−100
+764%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−767%
130−140
+767%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−789%
160−170
+789%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−714%
350−400
+714%
Hitman 3 12−14
−746%
110−120
+746%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−797%
350−400
+797%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−789%
160−170
+789%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−789%
160−170
+789%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−764%
190−200
+764%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−765%
450−500
+765%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−782%
150−160
+782%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−775%
70−75
+775%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−795%
170−180
+795%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−757%
120−130
+757%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−764%
95−100
+764%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−767%
130−140
+767%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−789%
160−170
+789%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−714%
350−400
+714%
Hitman 3 12−14
−746%
110−120
+746%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−797%
350−400
+797%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−789%
160−170
+789%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−789%
160−170
+789%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−764%
190−200
+764%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−805%
190−200
+805%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−765%
450−500
+765%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−782%
150−160
+782%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−775%
70−75
+775%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−757%
120−130
+757%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−764%
95−100
+764%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−767%
130−140
+767%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−714%
350−400
+714%
Hitman 3 12−14
−746%
110−120
+746%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−797%
350−400
+797%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−764%
190−200
+764%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
−757%
60−65
+757%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−765%
450−500
+765%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−789%
160−170
+789%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−746%
110−120
+746%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−800%
90−95
+800%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−733%
50−55
+733%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−733%
50−55
+733%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−775%
70−75
+775%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−805%
190−200
+805%
Hitman 3 10−11
−800%
90−95
+800%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−757%
120−130
+757%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−733%
50−55
+733%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−733%
50−55
+733%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−733%
350−400
+733%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−764%
95−100
+764%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
Hitman 3 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−789%
160−170
+789%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−757%
60−65
+757%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−757%
60−65
+757%

This is how PRO WX 3100 and RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is 746% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.59 59.65
Recency 12 June 2017 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 150 Watt

PRO WX 3100 has 130.8% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 805.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO WX 3100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon PRO WX 3100 is a workstation card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
Radeon PRO WX 3100
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 52 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.