GeForce GT 650M SLI vs Radeon PRO WX 2100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon PRO WX 2100 Radeon PRO WX 3100 Radeon PRO WX 9100
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GT 620M GT 625M GT 630M GT 635M GT 640M GT 640M LE GT 640M Mac Edition GT 645M GT 650M GT 650M Mac Edition GT 650M SLI

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO WX 2100 with GeForce GT 650M SLI, including specs and performance data.

PRO WX 2100
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 35 Watt
4.81

GT 650M SLI outperforms PRO WX 2100 by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

PRO WX 2100 PRO WX 2100
GT 650M SLI GT 650M SLI

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking649637
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.80no data
Power efficiency9.44no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameLexaN13E-GE
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date4 June 2017 (7 years ago)22 March 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512768
Core clock speed925 MHz790 MHz
Boost clock speed1219 MHz835 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattno data
Texture fill rate39.01no data
Floating-point processing power1.248 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2x2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit2x 128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth48 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPortno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
Optimus-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p70−75
−12.9%
79
+12.9%
Full HD45−50
−11.1%
50
+11.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.31no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−5.6%
18−20
+5.6%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Fortnite 24−27
−7.7%
27−30
+7.7%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−4.8%
21−24
+4.8%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Valorant 55−60
−3.4%
60−65
+3.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−5.6%
18−20
+5.6%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
−75.9%
139
+75.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Dota 2 35−40
−5.1%
40−45
+5.1%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Fortnite 24−27
−7.7%
27−30
+7.7%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−4.8%
21−24
+4.8%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
−3.4%
60−65
+3.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−5.6%
18−20
+5.6%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Dota 2 35−40
−5.1%
40−45
+5.1%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−4.8%
21−24
+4.8%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
−3.4%
60−65
+3.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
−7.7%
27−30
+7.7%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
−5.9%
35−40
+5.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−3.1%
30−35
+3.1%
Valorant 50−55
−6%
50−55
+6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 1−2
Valorant 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how PRO WX 2100 and GT 650M SLI compete in popular games:

  • GT 650M SLI is 13% faster in 900p
  • GT 650M SLI is 11% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GT 650M SLI is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GT 650M SLI is ahead in 37 tests (59%)
  • there's a draw in 26 tests (41%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 4.81 5.07
Recency 4 June 2017 22 March 2012
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm

PRO WX 2100 has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

GT 650M SLI, on the other hand, has a 5.4% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon PRO WX 2100 and GeForce GT 650M SLI.

Be aware that Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a workstation card while GeForce GT 650M SLI is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Radeon PRO WX 2100
NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M SLI
GeForce GT 650M SLI
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

PRO WX 2100 Radeon PRO WX 2100
vs
Tesla M2070 Tesla M2070
GT 650M SLI GeForce GT 650M SLI
vs
GTX 670MX GeForce GTX 670MX
PRO WX 2100 Radeon PRO WX 2100
vs
Quadro 5000 Quadro 5000
GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB
vs
RX 550X Mobile RX 550X Mobile
Pro 570 Radeon Pro 570
vs
Pro Vega 16 Pro Vega 16
Pro 575 Radeon Pro 575
vs
Xbox One X GPU One X GPU
Pro 580 Radeon Pro 580
vs
UHD Graphics 730 UHD Graphics 730
Pro 580 Radeon Pro 580
vs
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU Xe Graphics 96EU
PRO WX 2100 Radeon PRO WX 2100
vs
PlayStation 4 GPU 4 GPU
PRO WX 2100 Radeon PRO WX 2100
vs
PRO W7700 PRO W7700
PRO WX 3100 Radeon PRO WX 3100
vs
RTX 2070 Super Mobile RTX 2070 Super Mobile
PRO WX 3100 Radeon PRO WX 3100
vs
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
PRO WX 3100 Radeon PRO WX 3100
vs
T600 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 50 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 28 votes

Rate GeForce GT 650M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO WX 2100 or GeForce GT 650M SLI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.