HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) vs Radeon PRO W7600

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking128not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation69.61no data
Power efficiency19.60no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Gen. 8 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameNavi 33Braswell
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date3 August 2023 (1 year ago)1 April 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204812
Core clock speedno data320 MHz
Boost clock speed2440 MHz640 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Wattno data
Texture fill rate312.3no data
ROPs64no data
TMUs128no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed18 GB/sno data
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.1no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)11.2
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.2no data
Vulkan1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 August 2023 1 April 2016
Chip lithography 6 nm 14 nm

PRO W7600 has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO W7600 and HD Graphics 400 (Braswell). We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7600 is a workstation card while HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO W7600
Radeon PRO W7600
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 227 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.