GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Radeon PRO W7500

Place in the ranking	118	325
Place by popularity	not in top-100	5
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	100.00	13.69
Power efficiency	37.17	15.11
Architecture	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	Navi 33	GP107
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	3 August 2023 (1 year ago)	25 October 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$429	$139

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

PRO W7500 has 630% better value for money than GTX 1050 Ti.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1792	768
Core clock speed	1500 MHz	1291 MHz
Boost clock speed	1700 MHz	1392 MHz
Number of transistors	13,300 million	3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	70 Watt	75 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	no data	97 °C
Texture fill rate	190.4	66.82
Floating-point processing power	12.19 TFLOPS	2.138 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	32
TMUs	112	48
Ray Tracing Cores	28	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	216 mm	145 mm
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1344 MHz	7008 MHz
Memory bandwidth	172.0 GB/s	112 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort 2.1	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI	-	+
G-SYNC support	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready	no data	+
Ansel	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.7	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.2.131
CUDA	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO W7500 37.57
+130%

GTX 1050 Ti 16.36

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO W7500 14497
+130%

GTX 1050 Ti 6313

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	110−120 +124%	49 −124%
1440p	60−65 +114%	28 −114%
4K	55−60 +112%	26 −112%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	3.90	2.84
1440p	7.15	4.96
4K	7.80	5.35

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

24−27

+0%

24−27

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	48 +0%	48 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Battlefield 5	53 +0%	53 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Hitman 3	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Metro Exodus	56 +0%	56 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80 +0%	80 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	64 +0%	64 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Battlefield 5	44 +0%	44 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Far Cry 5	35 +0%	35 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	41 +0%	41 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Hitman 3	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Metro Exodus	46 +0%	46 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50 +0%	50 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24 +0%	24 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Far Cry 5	27 +0%	27 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	45 +0%	45 +0%
Hitman 3	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45 +0%	45 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	43 +0%	43 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	26 +0%	26 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

45−50

+0%

45−50

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	75 +0%	75 +0%
Hitman 3	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	32 +0%	32 +0%
Metro Exodus	29 +0%	29 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30 +0%	30 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

27−30

+0%

27−30

+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Hitman 3	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Metro Exodus	14 +0%	14 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Far Cry 5	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	20 +0%	20 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	17 +0%	17 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

+0%

14−16

+0%

This is how PRO W7500 and GTX 1050 Ti compete in popular games:

PRO W7500 is 124% faster in 1080p
PRO W7500 is 114% faster in 1440p
PRO W7500 is 112% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	37.57	16.36
Recency	3 August 2023	25 October 2016
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	6 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	70 Watt	75 Watt

PRO W7500 has a 129.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 7.1% lower power consumption.

The Radeon PRO W7500 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7500 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.