Radeon R7 M350 2GB vs PRO V710

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameNavi 32Litho
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date3 October 2024 (less than a year ago)5 May 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3456384
Core clock speed1900 MHz825 MHz
Boost clock speed2000 MHzno data
Number of transistors28,100 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)158 Wattno data
Texture fill rate432.019.80
Floating-point processing power27.65 TFLOPS0.6336 TFLOPS
ROPs968
TMUs21624
Ray Tracing Cores54no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount28 GB2 GB
Memory bus width224 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth504.0 GB/s64 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.86.5 (5.1)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.22.1 (1.2)
Vulkan1.31.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 October 2024 5 May 2015
Maximum RAM amount 28 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 28 nm

PRO V710 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 1300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO V710 and Radeon R7 M350 2GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon PRO V710 is a workstation card while Radeon R7 M350 2GB is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710
AMD Radeon R7 M350 2GB
Radeon R7 M350 2GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon PRO V710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon R7 M350 2GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.